Friday, 11 December 2009

Reinvigorating brand Santa (reprise)

The present situation

Santa has won the hearts and minds of his customers. But growth is fuelled by population expansion, retention rates are average at best. The customer relationship starts round age three and fades ages 7 to year 9. Santa is privately owned so there is no financial reporting requirement. The business model is hazy; it is not clear how Santa makes its money. To grow the business you require cashflow or substantial capital. Property lease back is a non starter; they only seem to have seasonal concessions within a variety of retail outlets. Lapland HQ is not practical for other businesses of this scale, so you wont be able to find alternative tenants. Opportunity cost of these assets would seem to be close to zero.

The solution to turning Santa around must lie on the revenue side of the equation.

Our recommendations.

1. Brand identity. Santa, St Nicholas, Father Christmas, Papai Noel, Babbo Natale – the different names dilute the brand. Choose one name and stick to it. It worked for Snickers. Whilst a name that resonates with the Chinese market is tempting we feel an English name provides the greatest global reach. SantaServices gives you brand stretch.

2. Create added value services e.g. charge for different delivery options, delivering on Christmas Day should be the premium not the standard service.

Why not charge for returns or provide warranties? It estimated that 15% of presents are damaged on Christmas Day. This must be a significant revenue opportunity.

3. Merchandise yourself how about replica kits for children; think laterally! What would be the equivalent of the soccer away strip? What about a light suit for hotter climates. Don’t be a slave to red.

4. Investigate sponsorship opportunities. Formula 1 would offer the best benchmark. Look for brand synergies, but obviously avoid competitors like DHL, red letters days unless there is a clear income opportunity.

5. Share of hearts. Make sure is on all packaging and clothing. “This present was bought you to by” reinforces the brand.

6. Embrace digital. Letters posted up chimneys is a nice touch but difficult to believe it is practical. And this hardly good for the environment. Email has to be the way forward. Make the website work harder, a personalised web experience is essential. And of course this year we are expecting mobile technologies to take off so integrating SMS is a must.

7. Brand experience days help your best customers embrace the brand. It is probably Pizza Express No.1 marketing activity. Children come along make Pizzas in the morning and pester their parents in the afternoon to return in the evening - and they pay for it.

8. Business continuity. Business is over-reliant on one man; no one is going to invest in a business without a clear succession plan. Consider an X-Santa type show.

Give Mrs Santa more of a role cf Cameron and Brown. Older men into children can be perceived as unusual e.g. Michael Jackson.

9. Go beyond the seasonal demand. One day a year! Enormous opportunity even if we don’t go 24x7x365. Of course it is possible more frequent Christmases may be difficult to market but the core competence is distribution and logistics. Look to provide corporate outsourcing solutions.

10. Develop a retention program for teenage into adult years, you know all about random acts of kindness. Make sure the C in CRM stands for Christmas.

11. PR. Appearance is everything. Looking that comfortable in the present climate does not seem appropriate. Even Puff daddy is forgoing bling in concession to the crunch. Obesity and children is a hot topic. We really do live in an age of style over content so think about going on TV with Gok or Gillian Mckeith.

12. Crisis management. Don’t get pissed in public even seemingly indestructible can be destroyed with 1 or 8 moments of madness. (Tiger Woods)

Thursday, 10 December 2009

Sunday, 22 November 2009

Seductive sponsorships

My indisputable hypothesis is that the bigger a sponsorship opportunity is, the harder it is to control it for the benefit of your brand. So i wonder why more brands don't sponsor lots of smaller events or the less well known sports. Understandably you are unlikely to hear 'lets own fell running, curling and netball' from a board table thumping CEO but there again smaller events tend to be more grateful and consequently do more to make sure the sponsorship works, they package it and activate if for you. Of course you don't get the reach but you do find consumers keener to repay the commitment. Estate agents and solicitors often find sponsorship of the local sports club pays back in revenues, social bonds being more powerful than financial ones. (see Predictably Irrational, Nursery school experience)

So when i am head of marketing for Bernard Matthews, Krispy Kreme or ACME I'll try to remember.

1) When i am offered a big sponsorship opportunity, look for a series of smaller simpler events that could potentially achieve the same results.
2) Look for opportunities before i am asked
3) Make sure it fits the business (before someone says anything obvious)
4) Think of sponsorship as earned rather than paid media i..e the cheque is only the beginning of a great relationship

Unless of course my new boss likes football and wants tickets to the world cup final. In which case i will pretend my 6 year old wrote this.

Wednesday, 18 November 2009

Second order decision making

Second order decisions are the rules we make up in our lives either to avoid making complex trade offs or remove the need to continuously reassess everyday choices.

So for example ...

* Sticking to one commute route regardless of traffic and weather conditions
* Putting your credit card in the freezer to avoid over usage.
* Deciding to buy - before entering the shop - what ever shower gel is on offer.
* Selecting an IFA you like rather than researching the product itself.
* Repeating your grocery order on line.

Identifying which decisions (and when) are second order and which are primary is a really good way to think about both categories and consumer decision making. If your market displays a high degree of second order decision making then the chances are the persuasion model of marketing may be less effective, your job is to break the habit get consumers to do something different.

Monday, 26 October 2009

The future of creative thinking

Sharing a summary of implications of behavioural economics for marketing and us agencies. Most of the specific examples are borrowed from the books listed at end of doc. The rest i hope is orginal. And thanks to Rory and the IPA for encouraging me to to dust off the old economic text books and take a second look at them.

Behavioural Economics

- A marketing perspective -

What is it?

Traditional economic models and assumptions don’t explain why people or consumers do what they do. Behavioural Economics has evolved to help us better understand how economic and consumer decisions are made. And increasingly behavioural economics is being used to explain anything and everything from why people don’t put enough money into their pensions to why it is difficult to get taxis on rainy days (and it is not because they are busy!)*

Behavioural economics is the study of why consumers and economic agents do what they do, especially when what they do is seemingly less than rational.

What is wrong with traditional economic thinking?

Traditional economics is normative in approach. It is rational and deductive, in other words you have to be very good at higher level maths, and a PHD helps.

It utilises two key assumptions.

- Perfect information or knowledge. All possible outcomes and corresponding rewards of an action are known in advance

- Every agent looks to maximise their ‘utility’ or profits at all times over the long term time horizon. I.e. they are rational.

If you adopt these assumptions then it follows, for one, that all stock markets would be efficient, they would assimilate information immediately and there would be no bubbles or ‘sentiment’. [this is a vast over-simplification but don’t worry about it]

Behavioural economics is different to traditional economics, it is built on observation. And observation shows we behave very irrationally. We display brand preference and establish purchasing habits. We spend today and save tomorrow. We smoke. And buying a Porsche is hardly a rational decision.

Why all the excitement now?

We have seen a vast increase in the availability of information, near perfect. Technology has provided us with tools to make more rational choices and as marketers we can increasingly measure what we do and observe behavioural clues (increasingly on line) – but still consumers behave in what we could refer to as irrational ways.

* See last page

Behavioural economics is intuitive

No one believes for a second that we make purely rational choices all the time or reappraise our purchase, health and educational choices on a regular basis ‘in order to maximise our utility’, but the assumption has always been that everything would even itself out over time across the population.

But we see people buying the same detergent their mother always bought. We do follow other people across the road without looking. We do consistently refuse to put enough into our pension. We have unsafe sex, none of this is rational but it makes sense. We do things with our right side of the brain. So clearly we can be rational, habitual as well as intuitive.

What makes behavioural economics doubley fascinating for us is that it is interested in how we can change this behaviour with what Thaler and Sunsten call ‘Nudges’.

Here are a couple of examples (from controlled experiments, not real life). They are taken from Nudge and Predictably Irrational.

Rome or Paris

Say a travel agent offers a weekend break to Paris or Rome; the Rome trip comes with breakfast inclusive. A certain proportion will select Rome, the rest Paris. However if you offer Paris, Rome without breakfast and Rome with breakfast no one selects Rome without breakfast, no surprises there; but there is a significant increase in those who now opt for the Rome with breakfast option over Paris. The Rome with breakfast option has become more interesting by virtue of the existence of a choice no one chooses, namely Rome without breakfast. Everything as they say is relative.

Population of Burundi

If you ask an (uninformed) group how many people live in Burundi they will come up with a figure. The average guess may or may not be close to the actual number. However if you ask them to estimate the population to the nearest Million and tell them that another group estimated 3 Million you will get a very different response. Try it.

And a real example:

Teenage pregnancies

Teenage mothers were given a $1 for every day they did not become pregnant with a second child. The birth rate dropped significantly even though the state benefits would outweigh the relatively insignificant $1 per day contribution. This is what they call a nudge, think of it as an incidental stimulus that modifies behaviour.

The language of behavioural economics

Behavioural economics has its own terminology. Here are the more commonly used.

Choice architecture: The way we present options determines your choice. Kids sweets at the check out or make up at the front of the store are examples.

Loss aversion: this reflects our tendency to prefer avoiding losses to acquiring gains. Experiments have revealed we are infinitely more annoyed about losing £10 as we are gaining £10. This has implications for how we present price rises, direct debit charges and incentives.

Status Quo bias: people will only change a habit or established behaviour if the incentive is significant.

Gambler’s fallacy: the balls have no memory! In other words just because it has not come up red for the last three spins it does not mean the next spin of the wheel is any more or less likely to come up red.

Self serving bias: Simply put I deserved my promotion, he was lucky. We look through the world through our very own goggles.

Money illusion: Economists refer to sticky downward pricing. People won’t sell their house at a nominal loss even if every other house is going down in value; we prefer to wait for our house to go up in nominal terms even if inflation has reduced the real value of the house.

Anchoring: The Burundi example is a classic illustration of this. Our responses often over rely on one piece of information.

Inequity aversion: Cut off his nose to spite his face if he thinks you are getting more than your fair share!

Herd behaviour: Individuals act in a group without thinking, believing that not everyone can be that wrong.

Calender effect: The classic one being the New Year resolution. Days and events in the calendar change our behaviour. Are you nicer at Christmas?

Hyperbolic discounting: Within reason – people state a preference for money now over a little bit more in a month’s time. However if they are given the same offer but it is delayed for 12 months they are happy to wait the extra month for the extra amount. So why the change in preference? This explains our attitudes to pensions.

Paradox of choice: Give me a choice of two or three things and I can hopefully decide what I want. Give me 27 (insurance services) and I am lost. This partly explains the existence of middle men and aggregators.

The good news

Most of us are regularly doing or have ‘done’ some behavioural economics within our roles as marketers. In many ways it is what we have done intuitively, behavioural economics is applied marketing.

  • Prize draws and incentives. Don’t miss out (rather than make sure you get).

  • Holiday companies. Book early to avoid disappointment. .

  • Application forms. Just tick this box and we will do the rest.

  • Loyalty programs utilising inertia.

  • Amazon. People like you also purchased.

  • RRP.

  • Leisure brands. You deserve it.

  • Bigger red buttons.

  • Pill packets with dates

  • Telecoms. Different calls packages with various free minute options to reframe the choice around incremental value.

  • Insurance brands. Automated renewal

  • Savings (or credit cards). “With just a £1 a day ...”.

  • Smoking cessation products.

And you could probably add semiotics and any re-positioning projects. Even our very own moments of truth are examples of utilising behavioural economics. Essentially behavioural economics explains what we, as marketers, have been doing for a while but importantly it gives us a framework and a language to do more of it, more often as part of ‘what we do’.

The big implications of behavioural economics

1. Perhaps more than we thought people are doing things without rationalising the decision. This challenges the traditional communications model of change attitude, then change behaviour. We know that if we make products and services more available or simpler to use they will be adopted. Perhaps communications should increasingly be used to reinforce the purchase and encourage inertia rather than change behaviour. Inertia, availability, group behaviour, options, comparisons are much more important marketing tools than we realised.

In other words getting them to do (respond, buy) first; worry about attitude later. Direct marketers take note.

2. The consumer may be making an active decision when and when not to be rational. For example, habit is fine when you are doing the weekly shopping. But if you love running you are going to take a bit longer choosing a pair of trainers and maybe the same applies when you buy a car.

Time is precious and sometimes we can’t be bothered to look around. So intuition and inertia are rational choices if the cost of error i.e. choosing the wrong product is deemed to be insignificant or the cost of acquiring the necessary knowledge to make the ‘correct’ purchase is perceived to be high. So if the consumer is less involved in the category, the chances are there is a greater opportunity to use the tools of the behavioural economist. This would apply to utilities and commoditised markets.

3. Agencies need to encourage their clients to let them focus on the problem, not the medium. How we solve it should not really matter. How we get paid for it will though.

Some final thoughts

- If we can influence choice literally by how we present the options what happens if the choice architect is unethical. (and is not paternalistically libertarian)

- Marketing and communication agencies are probably in the best place to utilise this thinking, how do they charge their clients way of thinking – about them?

- How do we structure our behavioural economics story or even our approach? When do we engage our client?

Want to know more? Then read


Undercover economist

The economic naturalist

Predictably irrational


Black Swan

*The taxi example: Taxi drivers make more money in wet weather faster. So once they have reached their target, it is off to the golf course. Makes sense when you think about it.

Tuesday, 20 October 2009

The new marketing funnel(s)

Thought i would share a couple of versions of the new marketing funnel, not exactly original but i really like the idea of ... long listing ... the notion that customers decide their initial selection maybe wrong after doing their research ... the acknowledgment that (digital allows) the added value relationship to start before the purchase ... brand 'exchangement' (whatever i mean by that, i have not fully thought that through but i wanted to make it more tangible than engagement) ... and that everything can change at the POS.

I also wanted to make it business friendly, something clients could put metrics against rather than just being told it's complex, and the customer is in control (even more so than last time we presented). Any thoughts appreciated or perhaps you have used something similar successfully.

See the other version below, it has a bit more detail and is a wee bit different.

The neo-classical funnel

Sorry about the title but is sort of says what i want to communicate. Comments appreciated. Posting an alternative version above.

Thursday, 8 October 2009

Customer centric vending

.... don't worry i can get some ... give me two minutes. Headache, what now? Don't go anywhere. I'll be back.

Its Anadin, what do you think it is.

That was a one off, but just in case i got something small, hard, shiny and comes in a canister.

... not a lot of garlic, why?

3 or will 2 be enough ... any brand preference?

The vending machines in the mens (mid market hotel) sell condoms, condoms - coloured, condoms - with Ferraris (why speed?) on the pack, something for erectile disfunction (whatever that is), headache tablets and, of course, mints

Great thinking. Good marketers solve a customer problem, they sell the solution - not the product. I get the nagging feeling they are missing a trick but cant think what that would be or whether it would fit in a vending machine?

Sunday, 4 October 2009

The social media conundrum

Most businesses understandably see social media as an attractive opportunity.
  • 200m blogs on blogger
  • 100m Youtube videos watched every day
  • 5,000m facebook minutes daily
  • 38% of all on line media is on social media platforms
  • 2/3 of the global internet population visit social networks and they are the 4th most popular on line activity
  • 20% of twitter conversations mention brands
Every marketing director is drooling by this stage, because in their heads they have added word of mouth and FREE-ish into this heady mix. Lots of customers for next to nothing brilliant. A facebook page, a bit of twitter, followed by world domination and entering newly developed south American markets, all before tea time. Just in time for early orders at Corney and Barrow or Yates Wine Lodge, depending on how business is doing.

Now to bring everyone back down to earth (because that is what i have to do as a job more often than not) we could make a rational argument pointing out the resource, content, relevance demands and complexities. It would be dull and you won't remember it anyway. Lets try another way.

WH Smiths have just launched their facebook page and you can twitter with them when ever you want. How does that make you feel? Excited? Thought not. But point made, that is how customers may see your brand's social media activity. By the way WH Smiths haven't or i hope they haven't.

Everyday millions of people commute into London by train, they sit there for two to three hours a day. A captive audience, waiting to be marketed to. That is why i am launching my commuter marketing agency tomorrow. I suspect your first reaction is, he is an idiot. Second reaction is why not just put an ad in the newspaper at least they will have something useful (content) to read. Third reaction is, if you are still being polite, 'we will include transport in the media schedule if it fits with the strategy, thanks for your contribution'.

So just because the customers are there does not mean there is the opportunity to market to them. Social media is a really confusing term. Most of them are social networking sites not marketing tools waiting to be utilised.

By all means use social media to listen, or resolve, engage and participate if you can add value but don't think of it as a marketing panacea. And of course first work out what your customers want and if you can credibly provide a solution. Many brands have used social media well (Dell, Mini, Amex, BT) but they have invested considerable time and resource, they also know what they wanted to get out of it.

The social media strategy is easy, do things that customers want or find useful. It's the execution which is the tricky time consuming bit.

Monday, 21 September 2009

Light at the end of the tunnel

I have not written anything in the last month because in the words of a colleague - I have even got bored with myself. Don't be silly, that is not possible! But i know what they meant. I don't know whether this is a common affliction in marketing, I suspect it is.

The problem is similar to the one in the 90s when we all talked about the wonderful world of what CRM technologies would deliver. We could all talk an infinitely better game than any clients internal system would let us deliver. And even today when businesses undergo a CRM audit or CRM capability analysis, the good ones score 40% or even lower. That wouldn't even get you an A* in media studies.

The same is happening with digital. We can can create a wonderful vision of tags, cookies, virtual databases, personalised web environments and collaborative filtering (what amazon do) but delivering is a bit tricky. The frustration is the deliverable gets diluted and can be miles away from what we can do or are allowed to - unless of course you are a pure play e-commerce or your business is doing badly enough to force you to re-engineer yourself.

That i am afraid is the silver lining upbeat swing at the end of the downbeat article, some organisations have no choice but to do things differently. Lack of budget focuses the mind. However i am an optimist - eventually.

And no I am not thinking about my clients.

Only positive cheery comments please.

Friday, 7 August 2009

Tech marketing = drug dealing

Just get it in the hands of your customers and they wont be able to give up the habit suppose that's why all the games retailers have the demo consoles in store.

But here is a great digital example. A chumby is a wi-fi device on which you can run apps, facebook, ebay, radio, transport information, news feeds, webcams. Keep it in the kitchen. They cost about £100.

But the really neat thing is that you can run a virtual chumby on your pc before you buy. Technology isn't real until you experience it.

This illustrates another point about digital making relationship marketing before the sale simpler and more cost effective.

Thanks to Rory Sutherland for showing me his virtual Chumby. If you want to set yours up go to .

Wednesday, 5 August 2009

It's not how much but how much more

Fascinating example of relative pricing.

Do we sell a mobile phone tariff for £10 pcm with 50 free minutes or 150 free minutes? They both undercut the competition but clearly the 150 minute free minutes tariff creates less margin but will be more attractive to consumers. So what do we do?

The answer. Do both. And put the price up.

So you have two potential communications

A) £10 pcm with 150 minutes

B) Choose between £10pcm and 50 minutes or £12pcm and 150 minutes.

Which sells more?

It's B) and they buy the more expensive option. This is counter intuitive but the consumer rationale is 100 free minutes extra for £2. No brainer.

It's all relative!

Tariffs and offer changed to protect any potential client confidentiality.

Friday, 19 June 2009

Top tips on how to get the worst out of your agency

  1. Don't brief them just ask them to do an ad or a letter or something.
  2. Never write anything down for them.
  3. Definitely don't give feedback, why should they have any clues.
  4. Make sure they understand that anyone who has money is in the target market.
  5. Under no circumstances provide information that suggests your product or service is different in any way shape or form.
  6. If they question this remind your agency of the power of your brand.
  7. BUT Provide attachments, as many as you can find. Too much knowledge can't be a bad thing.
  8. Talk about samples of one and your neighbours experience as much as you can.
  9. Never tell them the results of the campaigns or impact on sales
  10. Only allow a couple of days for them to produce the work, afterall writing can't be that difficult.
  11. Ensure that they work at cost, profits just go on long lunches anyway.
  12. Draw a concept for them in the briefing meeting, and tell them what your boss likes to see.
  13. Ask them to communicate as much as feasibly possible in anything they do.
  14. On no account ever present to them.

Saturday, 30 May 2009

Brand = information shortcut

You have probably seen all those presentations about 'what is a brand?'. They told us that the brand is a set of values over and above the product, that brands live inside the head of customers and so on. In some ways i saw it as an information short cut. I'll explain. If you trusted a brand you could buy it or from it in the safe knowledge that it would be OK, you would not being making [too big] a mistake. Essentially we did not have time as consumers to do all that research to evaluate every product, to work out what is best. So the brand communicated something about the product qualities.

But the weird thing is it is still an information short cut. Because there is too much information out there, we cant be bothered to do all that research so we opt for a brand we trust.

30 years ago we couldn't possibly do all the research we should to be 'rational' consumers
Now we have the information available and we cant always be bothered. We haven't got time.

Of course if you are spending lots of money or buying your favourite toy we will research it, but brands still matter. They still communicate but just in different ways.

Sunday, 24 May 2009

The end of awareness

Why do we still measure awareness? I suppose it allows us to justify the media schedule but some brands still treat it as the key measure. We have measured it historically because it was the easiest thing to measure and the measure most likely to shift. So that gave us a warm feeling.

However we should be more focused on things like ... Do you find this brand interesting, or different or appealing. Do you prefer it? Nothing else really matters - apart from whether they buy it or not.

I recognise this means it is even harder to separate the impact of the advertising and communications from the product or brand experience but unfortunately that is tough. It definitely doesn't work that way any more, assuming it ever did. I can think a brand is the coolest thing in the thing in the world but if 16 out of 37 reviews say it is crap i am not going to buy it.

Monday, 18 May 2009

Re-connecting the marketing funnel

It's B2B again.

What exactly is a quality lead, our clients always talk about them but rarely does it get defined. The sales perspective is something like a prospect who invites them to tender. But this is not perfect, the likes of IBM, HP, Vauxhall will more often than not be on the shortlist as part of a benchmarking exercise. Marketing would probably define a lead as anyone who has engaged with the organisation, either via an event or on line.

Clearly there is a disconnect and explains why sales often complain about marketing, sales understandably want easy sales.

We could 'settle' the argument is by linking the marketing database to the website to ad serving data and other on line marketing activity. Easier said than done. But in the meantime if anyone has a better definition or two of leads (that marketing and sales agree on) i would love to hear about it.

Friday, 8 May 2009

B2B - it is a very small market

Just read a report by BERR (Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform) on SMEs (small medium enterprises) in the UK.

Here are some headline stats

1. 99.9% of businesses are SMEs (under 250 employees)

2. Of 4.68m private sector enterprises in the UK, 3.6m don't have any employees and are probably shells.

3. There are less than 27,000 companies with more than 50 employees.

4. 50% of SMEs with 50 to 250 employees are family owned

You cant help but think there is a lot of sophisticated marketing chasing very few prospects of either value or readiness to buy, especially in terms of IT. So if someone like Avaya or HP know which sectors they are after they should go the extra inch and get on first name terms with their best prospects or perhaps invite them round for dinner. Big campaigns are just for the benefit of sales teams, providing a bit of momentum.

Saturday, 2 May 2009

Marketing rule 1a

Two posts ago (10th April) i wrote that you only need one marketing rule, be interesting. Well it is two weeks on and i want to add another one. I am trying to stretch it so it is part of rule, rule 1a?

Rule 1a is 'Be where they are'.

You have probably used this in every pitch involving digital so it is not original but it highlights the importance of media context as well as the opportunity to exploit search, social media and digital influence. It is pretty difficult to argue with rule 1a when we see how much consumers rely on search and peer opinion when purchasing anything more sophisticated than toilet duck. You regularly see figures like 90% plus using search before making a purchase on or off line. Last week i researched trainers, found out about over and underpronation (exactly), went to the store, happened to remember the brand and product; Brooks, Adrenaline. Then bought them up. Unfortunately for the marketing manager at Brooks they couldn't track this.

So the only marketing rules you need are :-

1. Be interesting
1a. Be where they are

I wont be adding any more rules in the forseeable future.

Technorati Profile

Friday, 24 April 2009

No more clicks

I did something very strange the other day. I clicked on a banner. Now with click through rates hovering around 0.2% on a so so day and the fact that we know there are some habitual clickers (god knows why) and some accidental clickers like my children (god knows where to). I think it is something to be remarked on. I don't click is becoming the modern equivalent of i don't watch ads.

Now I have to fess up. It was on a business site and the banner was taking me to a sister publication so you could argue it was a button or a link dressed up as a banner. So the only time i have clicked on a banner is in a contextual environment. I am not saying network buys don't cost in. Network buys clearly make sense for mass market products and awareness objectives but for specialist categories and b2b you may be better off looking at specialist networks or finding different ways to spend your money, like sponsored email, smarter search, links and buttons. Focussing on those people in the market mood. Never the less it still feels odd that this great thing the internet is premised on its ability to serve up relevant content but we still deliver marketing messages on a semi random basis.

The easy counter argument to this is that brands do invest in network display campaigns because it works; but you would be assuming that they can track activity through to sale. You would be surprised how few brands do this as well as they profess to.

Do you click?

Friday, 10 April 2009

The only marketing rule you will ever need

I have worked it out, forget your top ten lists. I know we all like lists but there is only one rule you need in the new marketing environment and that is.

Be interesting.

Ok we have known this for a while and you could say it is just another way of saying content, content, content.

But to be interesting you have to all of the following.

(1) segment your market - create personas if we want to get digital about it.
(2) understand your customers requirements
(3) give them the personal treatment
(4) be relevant
(5) get to the point quickly
(6) ignore your (product) agenda until you know what the consumer wants

I quite like the way HSBC give lots of business advice on their business banking pages but there again the choice for them is easy, business banking is inherently dull. I also had a look at Evans's website (the cycle people). They have some interesting areas like 'ride2work', 'news and events' but they should be part of the landing environment not something to do after you have scanned the product pages. And why don't they have lots of pages about great places to cycle or videos. If it is there, it is very well hidden.

Sales people always want the products up front which is ironic given that sales people always say good ones engage the customer before they talk about the product. You know the car salesman who asks you how you are going to use the car, what sort of trips you will make before talking petrol and cars.

Are we all just too good at ignoring our own advice?

Sunday, 5 April 2009

Big budgets can lead to lazy marketing

Some marketers have too much money. If they had limited budget they would :-

(1) Make sure the website was a focal point of the business
(2) Invest time in creating interesting content covering the category, events to video.
(3) Get a few staff to blog their little socks off
(4) Optimise the site for organic search
(5) Share as much as possible with key influencers
(6) Capture customer data, give customers a personal service, do CRM, maximise retention
(7) Give their brand personality
(8) Develop affiliate relationships - old style and new style affiliates
(9) Link, link, link

... and so on and so on

If they have too much money they :-

(a) Do big ads and talk about big ideas, (not lots of great little ideas)
(b) Run regular DM programs, saying the same thing to the same prospects again and again.
(c) Do lots of paid search
(d) Try to sell off the page
(e) Talk about being customer centric
(f) Copy their nearest competitors

Technorati Profile

About Me

My photo
United Kingdom
Just curious about marketing, psychology, economics, business, irrational behaviour, people, models, communications, advertising, market imperfections, b2b marketing. I work in the marketing communications industry for OgilvyOne.